2By The Numbers: The Violation Triggers
Sources: FunderPro, industry analysis
3The $1 Breach Rule: Instant Disqualification
The most shocking aspect of max loss manipulation: there is zero tolerance.
FunderPro Documentation:
"Breaching the limit by even $1 at any point will result in account closure, even if losses are recovered later. If your daily loss limit is $500, and you end the day with a -$501 loss, you've violated the rule. Even if you made $2,000 the day before, it won't save your account."
How the $1 Breach Rule Works
Example: $100,000 Account with 5% Daily Loss Limit
Scenario 1: Safe
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Max daily loss: $5,000
- • End of day loss: -$4,999
- • Result: Account safe
Scenario 2: Violation
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Max daily loss: $5,000
- • End of day loss: -$5,001
- • Result: Permanent disqualification
Scenario 3: Intraday Violation (Worst Case)
- • 10:00 AM: Account at -$5,001 (violation)
- • 11:00 AM: Account recovers to +$2,000
- • End of day: +$2,000 profit
- • Result: STILL DISQUALIFIED
The intraday breach counts permanently—even though you ended profitable.
Why This Rule Exists
Prop firms use automated systems that monitor equity in real-time. The instant your equity drops below the max loss threshold, the system:
- 1. Closes all open positions immediately
- 2. Locks the account from further trading
- 3. Flags the account as "violated" permanently
- 4. Sends termination notice (usually automated email)
There is no appeal process. No human review. No second chances. The $1 breach rule is absolute.
The Real Purpose:
The $1 breach rule guarantees maximum failures. Slippage, commission timing, or a brief equity dip can trigger violations even in profitable traders. This is by design—firms profit from challenge fee revenue when you fail and retry.
4The 5 Types of Max Loss Calculations
Not all max loss limits work the same way. Here are the 5 calculation types firms use:
Type 1: Static Drawdown (Fairest)
FAIRHow it works: A fixed loss limit based on your starting balance that never changes, even if your account grows.
Example:
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Static drawdown limit: 10% = $90,000
- • You grow account to $110,000
- • Max loss limit stays at $90,000
- • You have $20,000 buffer before violation
Why it's fair: The limit never moves, giving you full benefit of profits without increasing risk of violation.
Source: Industry documentation
Type 2: Trailing Drawdown (The Trap)
DANGERHow it works: A dynamic equity limit that moves UP as your account reaches new highest equity (including unrealized gains) and never moves down when your equity falls.
Example (The Trap):
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Trailing drawdown: 10% from highest equity
- • You have $5,000 open profit → Equity: $105,000
- • Trailing limit ratchets up to $94,500 (10% below $105k)
- • Open profit disappears → Equity drops to $100,000
- • You're only $5,500 from violation (not $10,000)
The key issue: trailing drawdown moves up with unrealized profits but never moves down—creating a tightening noose that makes violations more likely.
Why it's dangerous: Open profits temporarily inflate your equity, ratcheting the max loss limit higher. When those profits vanish, you're suddenly close to violation even though your closed P&L hasn't changed.
Type 3: Balance-Based Drawdown
MODERATEHow it works: Drawdown is calculated from your closed balance (realized profit or loss only). Open positions don't count.
Example:
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Max drawdown: 10% = $90,000
- • Closed balance: $98,000
- • Open trade: -$5,000 unrealized loss
- • Drawdown calculated on $98,000 only
- • No violation (as long as you don't close the losing trade)
The catch: You can hold losing positions to avoid violation, but you're still at risk. If the loss grows beyond max drawdown and you're forced to close, instant violation.
Type 4: Equity-Based Drawdown
HARSHHow it works: Drawdown includes both realized and unrealized P&L when calculating max loss. Open positions count toward your limit.
Example:
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Max drawdown: 10% = $90,000
- • Closed balance: $98,000
- • Open trade: -$8,500 unrealized loss
- • Current equity: $89,500
- • Violation triggered (below $90k threshold)
According to OFP Funding, equity-based drawdown tracks both open and closed trades, meaning a temporary unrealized loss can trigger permanent disqualification.
Why it's harsh: You can violate max loss while a trade is still open—before you even have a chance to manage the position or let it recover.
Type 5: Daily Loss Limit
STRICTHow it works: The maximum amount you're allowed to lose in a single trading day. Resets daily at midnight (or your firm's specified time).
Example:
- • Starting balance: $100,000
- • Daily loss limit: 5% = $5,000
- • Day 1: Lose $4,999 ✓ Safe
- • Day 2: Lose $4,999 ✓ Safe
- • Day 3: Lose $5,001 ✗ Violation
The timing trap: If your loss exceeds the limit during a trade and bounces back within the same day ending in profit, you can still get disqualified for breaching the daily loss limit.
Why it's strict: Intraday violations count, commissions add up quickly, and there's no rollover forgiveness from profitable days.
6How to Calculate Your Real Max Loss
Don't trust the stated max loss limit. Here's how to calculate what you can actually lose:
Step-by-Step Calculation
- 1. Start with stated max loss: $100k account × 5% = $5,000
- 2. Subtract commission buffer: Estimate daily trades × $7 commission
- 3. Subtract swap buffer: If holding overnight, factor $10-50/day
- 4. Subtract slippage buffer: Reserve 0.5-1% for slippage ($500-$1,000)
- 5. Final safe loss limit: Use 80% of remaining buffer to be safe
Example Result:
$5,000 stated max loss → $3,500 actual safe loss limit after all buffers. That's 30% less room than you thought!
7Firms Ranked by Max Loss Fairness
Based on drawdown type, commission inclusion, and transparency:
✓ Tier 1: Fairest Max Loss Rules
- MasterFunders - Static drawdown throughout, balance-based, commissions excluded
- TopStep - Transparent daily loss limits, clear calculation methods
- Earn2Trade - Static drawdown, reasonable buffers
⚠ Tier 2: Moderate Risk
- FTMO - Trailing in Phase 2, but transparent about it
- FundedNext - Equity-based but reasonable daily limits
✗ Tier 3: Harshest Max Loss Rules
- BluFX - Accusations without proof, retroactive rule changes
- Firms switching static → trailing - Undisclosed Phase 2 changes
- Most 2020-2024 startups - Aggressive equity-based + trailing + commissions counted
8The Trailing Drawdown Trap: Phase 1 vs Phase 2
The most devious manipulation: firms use static drawdown in Phase 1, then switch to trailing in Phase 2.
The industry pattern:
"Some firms use trailing only during evaluation and switch to static after funding. Others use trailing throughout. Most traders fail evaluations not because of bad trading, but because of unfair trailing limits."
This creates a trap where Phase 1 feels manageable, but Phase 2 becomes nearly impossible to pass.
9Documented Cases of Max Loss Manipulation
Case 1: BluFX Rule Changes (2023-2025)
According to investigations, even after passing both evaluation phases, traders were suddenly told they violated newly added risk management clauses.
Many accounts were deactivated just days before payout eligibility. BluFX routinely failed to disclose proper account histories or proof when accusing traders of breaking guidelines.
Case 2: The 1-Minute Profit Rule
Some firms state: "Profits from trades that are closed within 1 minute after opening will not be counted on Master accounts."
However, losses from <1min trades still count. This asymmetric rule pushes traders closer to max loss violations.
10Why Max Loss Rules Are Designed to Fail You
The economics are simple: firms profit when you fail.
The Business Model
- • 96% fail challenges - Max loss violations are #1 cause
- • Challenge fees are pure profit - $100-$500 per attempt
- • Retry revenue - Average trader retries 3-5 times
- • Zero payout cost - If you fail from max loss, firm pays nothing
Making max loss rules stricter (trailing, commissions counted, $1 breach tolerance, intraday violations) increases failure rates, which increases challenge fee revenue.
11How to Protect Yourself From Max Loss Violations
✓ Protection Checklist
- 1.Calculate Real Max Loss
Subtract commissions, swaps, slippage buffers. Use 80% of stated limit as your safe threshold.
- 2.Verify Drawdown Type
Ask support directly: Static or trailing? Balance or equity-based? Does it change between phases?
- 3.Track Equity Intraday
Don't just check end-of-day. Monitor your equity throughout the day to avoid intraday violations.
- 4.Use Stop Losses Always
Never let trades float without defined loss limits. Set stops at 50-70% of your daily buffer.
- 5.Choose Fair Firms
Prioritize firms with static drawdown, balance-based calculations, and excluded commissions.
- 6.Save Original Terms
Screenshot or PDF the terms of service when you start. If they change rules later, you have proof.
Key Takeaways
- →$1 breach = permanent termination - Zero tolerance, even if you recover instantly. Plan for this.
- →Trailing drawdown is a trap - Moves up with unrealized profits, never down. Avoid firms that use this.
- →Commissions count as losses - High-frequency traders lose 10-20% of buffer to fees.
- →Intraday violations count - Monitor equity continuously, not just end-of-day.
- →Phase 2 changes rules - Static → trailing is common. Verify before starting Phase 2.
- →96% fail from violations - Max loss rules are designed for failure to maximize challenge fee revenue.
- →Use 80% of stated limit - Your real safe loss limit is 20-30% less than advertised after all fees and buffers.
Final Warning:
Max loss rules are the #1 way firms fail traders. If a firm uses trailing drawdown, counts commissions, triggers on $1 breaches, and switches calculation methods between phases, they've designed the system for you to fail. Choose firms with transparent, fair max loss rules—or expect to pay retry fees indefinitely.